IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erp/reconx/p0012.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring Europeanisation of public communication: The question of standards

Author

Listed:
  • Hans-Jörg Trenz

Abstract

The emergence of a pan-European public sphere as a correlate of democratic governance in the EU is held to be difficult, if not impossible. This has shifted the research agenda to the Europeanisation of public and media communication. The European public sphere light is observed by measuring different degrees of Europeanisation of existing national media spheres. In applied research however, the notion of Europeanisation remains often very fuzzy and contested. The new agenda of Europeanisation has so far been mainly applied as a pragmatic research strategy. As such, it still lacks theoretical grounding and methodological coherence. For this purpose, the article raises the question of standards. Following a proposal of Johan Olsen, a distinction is made between the what, how and why of Europeanisation. This regards first of all the necessity to set diagnostic standards for designating the different phenomena of what is changing. Second, methodological standards must be set, which indicate how to measure the Europeanisation of public and media communication. Finally, public sphere research must critically address the question of evaluative standards to determine why Europeanisation takes place and when it can be considered to be a sufficient indicator for assessing a public sphere of a new quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Hans-Jörg Trenz, 2007. "Measuring Europeanisation of public communication: The question of standards," RECON Online Working Papers Series 12, RECON.
  • Handle: RePEc:erp:reconx:p0012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.reconproject.eu/main.php/RECON_wp_0712.pdf?fileitem=5882287
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    European public space; Europeanization; governance; identity; legitimacy; media;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:reconx:p0012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marit Eldholm (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.reconproject.eu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.