IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The Constitutional Treaty debates as revelatory mechanisms: Insights for public sphere research and re-launch attempts

Listed author(s):
  • Christoph Meyer
Registered author(s):

    The purpose of this paper is to examine the media debates concerning ratification of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe (TCE) from the perspective of public sphere research and in view of the decision by the 2007 Brussels European Council to initiate a new intergovernmental conference after the Dutch and French ‘No’ votes on the TCE. The main empirical basis for the paper are the results of an extensive media content analysis of ratification debates in six countries, which has been conducted by the members of the ConstEPS project at the Jean Monnet Chair at the University of Bremen. I will argue that their findings are largely consistent with previous research, but that they highlight for the first time the particular problems affecting the quality and Europeanization of public debates in new EU member states from Central and Eastern Europe. New media coverage of the EU is affected by problems of a lack of professionalisation, training, resources and independence among journalists, a lack of interest in institutional and identity issues combined with a lack of knowledge about the EU, and concerns about a lack of say and status within the EU. Given these problems a genuine mini-Treaty would have been a feasible option, while a full-scale re-launch of a constitutionalisation process would be premature for the foreseeable future. The June European Council has agreed, however, on a Maxi-Treaty, which is likely to lead to new calls for referenda and subsequent frustration as these calls are likely to be ignored. The only solution to the ‘fait accomplit’ syndrome in European integration is to create more opportunity structures for European-wide voting on political representatives and issues.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by RECON in its series RECON Online Working Papers Series with number 6.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 15 Jul 2007
    Handle: RePEc:erp:reconx:p0006
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:reconx:p0006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marit Eldholm)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.