IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erp/euirsc/p0256.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Biomedicine and EU Law: Unlikely Encounters?

Author

Listed:
  • Stéphanie Hennette-Vauchez

Abstract

Over the last decade, a significant body of biomedical law has emerged within EU law. In so far as the EU has long been portrayed as aiming mostly if not only at economic integration, it is surprising at face value to see issues such as human embryonic stem cell research or trade in oocytes even reach the EU's political and legal agenda. Although it is possible to argue that the puzzle waters down when one considers not only that EU has in fact always been open to 'non-market' values on the one hand but also that biomedical issues have themselves undergone radical transformations recently, as one commonly speaks now of 'Tissue Economies', these elements do not seem to suffice for explaining the development of a body of biomedical law within EU law. It is argued here that many of the legal technicalities that sustain the view that the EU does not have any straightforward competences in the field have been balanced by the specifically 'polity-building' dimension of 'Ethics' (and here bioethics). In other words, the research presented here establishes several manners in which 'Ethics'' have been instrumental in the EU law making process, thus bridging EU law and biomedicine and simultaneously enabling the EU to assert itself as polity.

Suggested Citation

  • Stéphanie Hennette-Vauchez, 2010. "Biomedicine and EU Law: Unlikely Encounters?," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 46, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
  • Handle: RePEc:erp:euirsc:p0256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1814/14174
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://cadmus.eui.eu/dspace/bitstream/1814/14174/1/RSCAS_2010_46.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:euirsc:p0256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Valerio PAPPALARDO). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/rsiueit.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.