IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erp/arenax/p0206.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

It’s the Process Stupid! Process Tracing in the Study of European and International Politics

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey T. Checkel

Abstract

Process tracing is in, acquiring near buzz-word status in certain circles. Europeanists do it; IR scholars do it – all with the goal of bringing theory closer to what really goes on in the world. This makes our scholarship more policy relevant and increases the reliability of our findings - non-trivial advantages, for sure. Yet, such benefits do not come without costs. In particular, proponents of process tracing should be wary of losing sight of the big picture, be aware of the method’s significant data requirements, and recognize certain epistemological traps inherent in its application.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey T. Checkel, 2005. "It’s the Process Stupid! Process Tracing in the Study of European and International Politics," ARENA Working Papers 26, ARENA.
    • Handle: RePEc:erp:arenax:p0206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.arena.uio.no/publications/working-papers2005/papers/05_26.xml
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Islam Jusufi, 2018. "Aid and its impact on domestic change: The case of police reforms in Macedonia," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(6), pages 743-758, October.
    2. Liliana B. Andonova & Ioana A. Tuta, 2014. "Transnational Networks and Paths to EU Environmental Compliance: Evidence from New Member States," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 775-793, July.
    3. Charles Conteh, 2013. "Strategic Inter-Organizational Cooperation in Complex Environments," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 501-521, May.
    4. Marianne Riddervold, 2016. "(Not) in the Hands of the Member States: How the European Commission Influences EU Security and Defence Policies," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 353-369, March.
    5. Petr Kaniok, 2014. "EU Presidency as a Tool of Agenda Setting: Europe without Frontiers [Předsednictví Rady EU jako nástroj práce s agendou: Evropa bez bariér]," Současná Evropa, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(1), pages 49-69.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:arenax:p0206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sindre Eikrem Hervig (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.arena.uio.no/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.