IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eps/cepswp/12740.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Introducing EU Reduction Targets on Regulatory Costs: A Feasibility Study

Author

Listed:
  • Renda, Andrea

Abstract

This report looks at the feasibility of a European Commission initiative aimed at adopting net reduction targets for regulatory costs. As many as 14 alternative options are compared in terms of their comprehensiveness, accuracy, methodological simplicity, timeliness of implementation and compatibility with existing political commitments. The study calls for the adoption of a sequential approach to cost reduction, which implies that the Commission starts setting reduction targets in selected policy areas as early as the end of 2017, and gradually builds capacity over time on the quantification of regulatory costs for all the relevant EU acquis. The report was commissioned by RegWatchEurope, the banner under which Europe�s seven independent national advisory boards coordinate to address and maximise the benefits of Europe�s �smart regulation� agenda and reduce regulatory burdens.

Suggested Citation

  • Renda, Andrea, 2017. "Introducing EU Reduction Targets on Regulatory Costs: A Feasibility Study," CEPS Papers 12740, Centre for European Policy Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:12740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/RR_%20REGULATORY%20COSTS.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cesar Cordova-Novion & Stephane Jacobzone, 2011. "Strengthening the Institutional Setting for Regulatory Reform: The Experience from OECD Countries," OECD Working Papers on Public Governance 19, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giulia Listorti & Egle Basyte‐Ferrari & Szvetlana Acs & Paul Smits, 2020. "Towards an Evidence‐Based and Integrated Policy Cycle in the EU: A Review of the Debate on the Better Regulation Agenda," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(6), pages 1558-1577, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Renda, Andrea & Laurer, Moritz & Modzelewska, Ada & Zarra, Antonella, 2019. "Feasibility Study: Introducing �One-In-One-Out� in the European Commission - Final Report for the German Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy," CEPS Papers 25815, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    2. Édgar González López (Director), 2017. "El ecosistema digital y las autoridades de regulación de los sectores audiovisual y TIC," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 948, October.
    3. Leoš Vítek, 2012. "Regulatory Impact Assessment in the Czech Republic," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2012(3), pages 63-78.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:12740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Margarita Minkova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepssbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.