IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/enp/wpaper/eprg2011.html

On Green Growth with Sustainable Capital

Author

Listed:
  • Parantap Basu

    (Durham University Business School, Durham University)

  • Tooraj Jamasb

    (Copenhagen Business School)

Abstract

We develop an endogenous growth model to address a long standing question whether sustainable green growth is feasible by re-allocating resource use between green (natural) and man-made (carbon intensive) capital. In our model, final output is produced with two reproducible inputs, green and man-made capital. The growth of the man-made capital causes depreciation of green capital via carbon emissions which the private sector does not internalize. A benevolent government uses carbon taxes to encourage Örms to substitute carbon intensive man-made capital with green capital that the production technology allows. Doing so, the damage to natural capital by emissions can be reversed through a lower, but socially optimal long run growth. This trade-off between environmental policy and long-run growth can be overcome by a combination of an investment in pollution abatement and higher total factor productivity
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Parantap Basu & Tooraj Jamasb, 2020. "On Green Growth with Sustainable Capital," Working Papers EPRG2011, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
  • Handle: RePEc:enp:wpaper:eprg2011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/eprg-wp2011.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Murphy, Erin L. & Bernard, Miranda & Gerber, Leah R. & Dooley, Kevin J., 2021. "Evaluating the role of market-based instruments in protecting marine ecosystem services in wild-caught fisheries," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    2. Robbie Maris & Mark Holmes, 2023. "Economic Growth Theory and Natural Resource Constraints: A Stocktake and Critical Assessment," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 56(2), pages 255-268, June.
    3. Surana, Kavita & Singh, Anuraag & Sagar, Ambuj D, 2020. "Strengthening science, technology, and innovation-based incubators to help achieve Sustainable Development Goals: Lessons from India," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    4. Natalia P Montoya & Lia C O B Glaz & César C C Abad & Lucas A Pereira & Irineu Loturco, 2020. "What teachers need to know and be able to do: A view from teachers, students, and principals in the Brazilian context," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-12, September.
    5. Vogt, Christine A. & Andereck, Kathleen L. & Pham, Kim, 2020. "Designing for quality of life and sustainability," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    6. Jan Kovanda, 2021. "Economy‐wide material system analysis: Mapping material flows through the economy," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(5), pages 1121-1135, October.
    7. Zaiton Hassan & Norhayati Hussin & Hasnah Hashim & Nurul Syfa Mohd Tokiran, 2020. "Information Seeking in Knowledge Society: Choose Right from Wrong," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(3), pages 151-158, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • E1 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
    • O4 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity
    • Q2 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:enp:wpaper:eprg2011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ruth Newman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/jicamuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.