IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehs/wpaper/8005.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Prepaid tickets to ride to the New World: the New York Continental Conference and transatlantic steerage fares 1885-1895

Author

Listed:
  • Torsten Feys

    (European University Institute)

Abstract

"As maritime historian Francis Hyde noted in Cunard and the North Atlantic: “the real point to grasp is that it was the steamship which changed the whole nature, organization and profitability of the migrant trade.” Only because of the increased organization and commercialization of this trade, based on a system which had been developing since the 18th century, was the transatlantic migrant movement able to attain the sheer volume it had. These high numbers allowed the steam shipping companies involved in migrant trade to become some of the biggest companies worldwide. Although maritime and migration networks have often been treated separately, the commercialization of migrant transport firmly connected both. These networks encompassed the whole Atlantic world connecting state authorities, business and labor interests and individual migrants, yet the key role of steam shipping companies in these networks remains relatively unexplored. This paper will examine how shipping companies tried to take control over the agent-network in the US where the market of return and prepaid tickets (bought in America for someone in Europe to make the crossing) expanded with the introduction of steam. By using the archives of the Holland America Line (HAL) running a service between Rotterdam and New York, the paper will take a closer look how these companies managed the migrant passage business through shipping conferences. The business was first entrusted to migrant brokers who had specialized in supplying ships with passengers through a network of migrant agents and subagents during the age of steam. The HAL took the passage business into own hands first in Europe in 1877 and in the US in 1886. Contrary to prior assumptions, this transition was slow to materialize. Migrant brokers remained important middlemen because of their ties with the agents and because fierce competition between the shipping companies for the trade enabled them to play the lines against each other to their advantage. The more intense the competition between the lines, the higher the commission of migrant brokers and agents, hence the latter had no interest in a stable market of controlled fares to the New World. This pushed the firms to collude, establishing shipping conferences to neutralize the competition among them, fix prices and take control over the agent-network. Based on the correspondence of the HAL head-agent in New York and the minutes of the New York Continental Conference uniting the biggest continental steamship lines this article analyzes how successful the conference agreements were. What were the internal and external pressures undermining the conference? What effect did the conference “pool agreements” of the early 1890s have? How did they influence the prepaid and return steerage fares on the North Atlantic?"

Suggested Citation

  • Torsten Feys, 2008. "Prepaid tickets to ride to the New World: the New York Continental Conference and transatlantic steerage fares 1885-1895," Working Papers 8005, Economic History Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:8005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ehs.org.uk/dotAsset/16f89ed3-cc0b-4d00-b5a7-a960074ba23d.doc
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Torsten Feys, 2017. "Between the Public and the State: The Shipping Lobby's Strategies against US Immigration Restrictions 1882–1917," International Migration Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 344-374, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N00 - Economic History - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:8005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chair Public Engagement Committe (currently David Higgins - Newcastle) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.