IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehs/wpaper/5075.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sons and mothers: family relations and sources of family income in early industrial Britain

Author

Listed:
  • Jane Humphries

    (University of Oxford)

Abstract

"Quantitative and qualitative evidence has been extracted from 595 working-class autobiographies covering the period of the industrial revolution in Britain. It has been used to establish the origins of family subsistence and the nature of family relations. Investigation of the economic roles of mothers and fathers suggests the early and widespread predominance of reliance on the earnings of the male household head with mothers predominantly engaged in domestic activities. Less than 40 per cent of mothers augmented family incomes and many of these worked only spasmodically or in response to some family crisis that incapacitated or unemployed the male breadwinner. The families were “Parsonian” in their structure and function even though drawn from a pre and early industrial context. This division of labour structured relationships within families. Fathers became distant figures. “Providing” fulfilled their responsibilities. In the home, and in the life of the child, mothers were supreme and it was to their mothers that the autobiographers cleaved, allying with them against the rest of the world which sometimes included their fathers. These “Parsonian” family dynamics have implications for the age at which sons started work, first jobs and the control of their earnings. They also bear on the nature and consequences of inter-generational contracts for care and support that bound parents and children together over time."

Suggested Citation

  • Jane Humphries, 2005. "Sons and mothers: family relations and sources of family income in early industrial Britain," Working Papers 5075, Economic History Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:5075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ehs.org.uk/dotAsset/1430448a-1eff-4df5-bc27-9df7b3fa21ba.doc
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N00 - Economic History - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:5075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chair Public Engagement Committe (currently David Higgins - Newcastle) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.