IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehs/wpaper/5072.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Women, accounts and numeracy in 17th century England

Author

Listed:
  • Judith Spicksley

    (University of Hull)

Abstract

"While a considerable amount of time and energy has been spent investigating the extent of women’s literacy in the early modern period, little, if anything has been written about their levels of numeracy. This omission is at least in part the result of difficulty in its measurement, and not just among women. As Keith Thomas revealed some years ago, numeracy did ‘not leave evidence which can be readily measured’; moreover, levels of numeracy are ‘entirely a matter of degree.’ Though the ability to count may have been considered a distinctively human quality in the Tudor and Stuart periods, simply knowing ‘how many beans made twenty was hardly proof of great numerical dexterity’. Yet the survival of a considerable number of personal, household, and business accounts that can be directly attributed to women appears to challenge the notion that arithmetic ‘was not a normal part of the education of a lady’, and that ‘women lagged behind in numeracy, perhaps even more than they did in literacy.’ Mathematics may not have been part of the female curriculum, but in this paper I intend to argue that in terms of basic arithmetical skills – numeration, addition and subtraction – women of gentry status, at least, may well have been more numerate than their male counterparts. This was in essence the product of a gendered system of education, in which boys studied the classics, rhetoric, logic, and philosophy, while girls acquired social and domestic skills: reading, writing, housewifery and spinning or needlework, with the addition of musical pursuits and the romantic languages for those of higher status. For as Thomas himself argued, the emphasis of the humanist curriculum on the acquisition of knowledge rather than skills may have put men at a disadvantage in terms of basic computation. Gentlewomen, on the other hand, were considerably more accomplished in this area, for the acquisition of housewifery skills remained the pinnacle of achievement, and with it, the upkeep of the household accounts. During the seventeenth century mathematical skills for men grew in importance – both in terms of pure and applied mathematics – and numerical analysis, as Thomas has revealed, ‘established itself as one of the dominant forms of intellectual enquiry.’ Women remained largely excluded from this mathematical revolution and their knowledge of arithmetic was restricted: the construction of accounts could have been completed with knowledge of addition and subtraction alone, and women may have ventured little beyond these areas. Nevertheless, gentlewomen at least may well have been more adept at basic computation than historians have been inclined to accept."

Suggested Citation

  • Judith Spicksley, 2005. "Women, accounts and numeracy in 17th century England," Working Papers 5072, Economic History Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:5072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ehs.org.uk/dotAsset/215c2cf7-a323-4c83-8caf-8537bc71c7d3.doc
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N00 - Economic History - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:5072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chair Public Engagement Committe (currently David Higgins - Newcastle) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.