IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehs/wpaper/17015.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The impact of demand for labour and economic structure on Dutch unmarried women’s labour force participation, 1812-1929

Author

Listed:
  • Corinne Boter

    (Wageningen University)

  • Pieter Woltjer

    (Wageningen University)

Abstract

"Extensive research has demonstrated that female labour force participation (FLFP) in Western Europe decreased during the second half of the nineteenth century. During this period, in the Netherlands, FLFP was even lower than in surrounding countries such as England and Belgium. Until now, most scholars have argued that social norms were driving this development. This study argues that social norms were merely one side of the coin and it combines factors of supply as well as demand in a logistic regression based on nearly 2 million marriage records from the period 1812-1929. Our results show that sectoral shifts in the Dutch economy explain almost half of the decline of FLFP over the entire period. We exploit regional variation to demonstrate the importance of considering local labour markets when investigating FLFP. Furthermore, we support our results from the logistic regression with qualitative information from nineteenth-century labour surveys. As such, this research is a combination of qualitative and quantitative research methods."

Suggested Citation

  • Corinne Boter & Pieter Woltjer, 2017. "The impact of demand for labour and economic structure on Dutch unmarried women’s labour force participation, 1812-1929," Working Papers 17015, Economic History Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:17015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ehs.org.uk/dotAsset/98d2f8ef-e9d9-4280-bca5-0b7201a0a295.docx
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N00 - Economic History - - General - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:17015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chair Public Engagement Committe (currently David Higgins - Newcastle) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.