IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehs/wpaper/10018.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The moral economy of the Scottish industrial community: new perspectives on the 1984-5 miners’ strike

Author

Listed:
  • Jim Phillips

    (University of Glasgow)

Abstract

"This paper makes a contribution to debates about the economic framework of industrial politics by examining aspects of the 1984-5 Miners’ Strike in Britain, focusing on developments in Scotland. It focuses on the material and moral resources available to the strikers. The strike against pit closures is generally understood in terms of peak level relations between the Conservative government, the National Coal Board (NCB) and the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM), and the shifts in energy supply that decisively weakened the miners’ bargaining position. It is also often portrayed as a top-down imposition on the workforce and the industry by the ‘politically-motivated’ union leadership, and as a public order issue, with many arrests and prosecutions arising from the picketing of mines, steel works and other economic units."

Suggested Citation

  • Jim Phillips, 2010. "The moral economy of the Scottish industrial community: new perspectives on the 1984-5 miners’ strike," Working Papers 10018, Economic History Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:10018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ehs.org.uk/dotAsset/935872b3-17dc-4516-8fa5-a7506193c410.doc
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N00 - Economic History - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:10018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chair Public Engagement Committe (currently David Higgins - Newcastle) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.