IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/wpaper/22477.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

In what way, and to what degree, did the Mughal state inhibit Smithian growth in India in the seventeenth century?

Author

Listed:
  • Ellis, Frank W.

Abstract

The nature of the seventeenth-century Mughal state and its land revenue taxation system has become a matter of controversy in recent years. Irfan Habib and his followers dominated thinking on this subject from the sixties onwards. They saw the regime as highly centralized and essentially extractive in nature. The land revenue system was designed to extract the whole surplus, leaving the peasants immiserated. Trade was sterile in that it was state inspired, and required to meet the cash demands of the tax system. ‘Natural’ commerce and Smithian growth scarcely existed, since there was no surplus after the state had taken its share. This view has been challenged by economic historians such as Frank Perlin, David Washbrook and Sanjay Subrahmanyam, who believe that much of the revenue was redistributed back to local interests, and that there were thriving regional and, for some goods, national markets. They also think that central control was weak in many areas, especially southern India, and that the proportion of agricultural produce actually collected was much less than claimed by Habib. The dissertation looks firstly at the evidence that the state extracted the whole surplus, and in particular at a statistical study by Shireen Moosvi, based on source data from the A’in-I Akbari. The quality of the source and the internal consistency of Moosvi’s calculations are examined, and the conclusion reached is that the peasants could not have paid at the level hypothesized. The second part of the study is particularly concerned with the growing spatial division of activity, characterized by free market exchange, because if this was happening then Smithian growth was underway. This section looks at merchants and credit institutions, external and internal trade, and revisionist thinking. The associated subjects of transportation and the structure of the textile industry are also touched upon. The overall conclusion is that while some agricultural production was consumed by the peasants and so did not enter the market, and much was doubtless exchanged to meet revenue demands, there was also a commercial economy, which may well have borne comparison with pre-modern Europe and China.

Suggested Citation

  • Ellis, Frank W., 2005. "In what way, and to what degree, did the Mughal state inhibit Smithian growth in India in the seventeenth century?," Economic History Working Papers 22477, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:wpaper:22477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/22477/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Banks, 1988. "Nineteenth-century scandal or twentieth-century model? A new look at‘open’and‘close’parishes," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 41(1), pages 51-73, February.
    2. Peter M. Solar, 1995. "Poor relief and English economic development before the industrial revolution," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 48(1), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Donald Woodward, 1980. "The Background to the Statute of Artificers: The Genesis of Labour Policy, 1558–63," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 33(1), pages 32-44, February.
    4. Humphrey R. Southall, 1991. "The tramping artisan revisits: labour mobility and economic distress in early Victorian England," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 44(2), pages 272-296, May.
    5. Anne Digby, 1975. "The Labour Market and the Continuity of Social Policy after 1834: The Case of the Eastern Counties," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 28(1), pages 69-83, February.
    6. Millward, R., 1981. "The emergence of wage labor in early modern England," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 21-39, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N0 - Economic History - - General
    • B1 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925
    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General
    • O53 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Asia including Middle East

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:wpaper:22477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (LSERO Manager on behalf of EH Dept.). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/chlseuk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.