IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/141824.html

Evaluating the impact of unconditional cash transfers on poverty alleviation and women’s empowerment in Pakistan: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Abro, Zaid
  • Mumtaz, Zahid

Abstract

This study conducts a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of Pakistan’s Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP), the country’s largest unconditional cash transfer initiative, on poverty reduction and women’s empowerment. Using robust variance estimation (RVE) meta-analysis to account for effect-size dependencies and heterogeneity, the study synthesises quantitative evidence from evaluations of BISP. The findings show a modest but statistically significant positive effect on poverty alleviation. In contrast, there is no statistically significant evidence that BISP improves women’s empowerment, although individual studies report some gains in mobility and decision-making. High heterogeneity across studies indicates substantial variation in outcomes across contexts and measures. The findings highlight the limitations of relatively low-value cash transfers in generating transformative improvements in poverty and women’s empowerment. They suggest that complementary interventions and broader structural reforms may be necessary for cash transfers to produce more substantial and sustained improvements in household welfare and women’s agency.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Abro, Zaid & Mumtaz, Zahid, 2026. "Evaluating the impact of unconditional cash transfers on poverty alleviation and women’s empowerment in Pakistan: a systematic review with meta-analysis," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 141824, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:141824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/141824/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:141824. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.