IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/140685.html

Frozen but not recovered: state capacity and the gap between seizing and realising assets in wartime Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Banat, Maliek

Abstract

Ukraine’s Asset Recovery and Management Agency (ARMA) is the oversight body for sanctioned assets that have been seized in the war due to alleged criminal links to the Russian regime, its economy or support for its war of aggression in Ukraine. As such, it represents a key civilian institution in the war effort, as it aims to manage sanctioned assets for the benefit of the Ukrainian people and its democratic institutions. This report highlights, however, the problem that ARMA has repeatedly failed to convert these assets into sources of economic revenue for the Ukrainian state. This report is a first cut analysis of some of the challenges that Ukraine faces as it seeks to reform its public institutions – protecting them against capture by private and vested interests – while continuing to prosecute the war of national survival against Russia’s invasion. Resource constraints have meant that we have not been able to combine this analysis of public sources with qualitative interviews, which would have allowed us to develop a fuller and more granular picture. This means that the analysis presented necessarily has a provisional character. The report analyses some of the issues facing Ukraine in the governance field and makes some initial recommendations for how they might be overcome through further public interest reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Banat, Maliek, 2026. "Frozen but not recovered: state capacity and the gap between seizing and realising assets in wartime Ukraine," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 140685, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:140685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/140685/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N0 - Economic History - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:140685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.