Author
Listed:
- Barreix Sibils, Gonzalo
- Volmir Rezende Anderle, Rodrigo
- Ferreira da Silva, Andrea
- de Oliveira Ferreira de Sales, Lucas
- Pena, Daiana
- Monti, Caterina
- Garcia Vaz, Claudia
- Esposito, Lucio
- Anderson, Edward
- Jara, H. Xavier
- Santa, Hugo
- Dos Santos de Jesus, Gabriela
- Medeiros Cavalcanti, Daniella
- Nhacolo, Ariel
- Macicame, Ivalda
- Bassat, Quique
- Rasella, Davide
Abstract
Background. The ongoing decline in funding for humanitarian and development assistance stands in stark contrast to the global rise in wealth concentration and widening socioeconomic inequalities. This study aimed to assess whether the implementation of wealth-redistribution policies proposed in recent high-level international agreements to support development could mitigate the health impact of the current Official Development Assistance (ODA) defunding crisis. Methods. We conducted an integrated retrospective and forecasting analysis using longitudinal panel data from 59 low-income and lower-middle-income countries (LLMICs). First, we estimated the association between per-capita ODA and mortality outcomes from 2002 to 2021 using two-way fixed-effects multivariable Poisson regression models with robust standard errors, adjusting for key demographic, socioeconomic, and health-system covariates. We performed extensive sensitivity and triangulation analyses to assess the robustness and plausibility of the findings. We then evaluated ten wealth-redistribution policies with validated country-level microsimulation models to forecast mortality under alternative wealth redistribution scenarios versus defunding through 2030. Findings. Higher ODA funding levels were associated with a 24% reduction in age-standardised all-cause mortality (rate ratio [RR]:0.76;95%CI:0.67-0.87) and a 33% reduction in under-five mortality (RR:0.67;95%CI:0.50-0.89). Forecasting analyses showed that under the current ODA funding reductions in LLMICs, all ten wealth redistribution policies were associated with millions of averted deaths by 2030: in all ages, from 6,591,984 (95%UI:4,884,075–8,374,138) for a 3% Crypto Tax of the top 10,000 holders to 29,509,934 (95%UI:20,273,842–38,603,961) for a 3% wealth tax on ultra-high-net-worth individuals; in children under-five, from 1,312,912 (95%UI:802,926–1,785,121) to 3,464,607 (95%UI:1,235,930–5,609,331), respectively. Interpretation. The implementation of wealth-redistribution policies proposed in recent high-level international agreements could mitigate the health consequences of the current ODA defunding crisis, avert millions of deaths, and support the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals.
Suggested Citation
Barreix Sibils, Gonzalo & Volmir Rezende Anderle, Rodrigo & Ferreira da Silva, Andrea & de Oliveira Ferreira de Sales, Lucas & Pena, Daiana & Monti, Caterina & Garcia Vaz, Claudia & Esposito, Lucio & , 2026.
"Wealth redistribution policies to mitigate the impact of development assistance defunding: a retrospective evaluation and forecasting analysis up to 2030,"
LSE Research Online Documents on Economics
139081, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
Handle:
RePEc:ehl:lserod:139081
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- N0 - Economic History - - General
- E6 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook
- J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following
NEP Reports:
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:139081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.