IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/138850.html

Cost-effectiveness of catheter ablation in end-stage heart failure with atrial fibrillation: insights from CASTLE-HTx

Author

Listed:
  • Boettger, Priyanka
  • Moersdorf, Maximilian
  • Sommer, Philipp
  • Marrouche, Nassir F.
  • Costard-Jaeckle, Angelika
  • Crijns, Harry J.G.M.
  • Bergau, Leonard
  • Fox, Henrik
  • Hindricks, Gerhard
  • Dagres, Nikolaos
  • Schramm, Rene
  • Fink, Thomas
  • Khalaph, Moneeb
  • Sciacca, Vanessa
  • Didenko, Maxim
  • Konietschke, Frank
  • Rudolph, Volker
  • Gummert, Jan
  • Tijssen, Jan G.P.
  • Sossalla, Samuel
  • Sohns, Christian

Abstract

Background The CASTLE-HTx (Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in patientS With End-sTage Heart Failure and Eligibility for Heart Transplantation; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04649801) trial showed that the combination of catheter ablation and guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) was associated with a lower likelihood of a composite of death from any cause, implantation of a left ventricular assist device, or heart transplantation (HTx) in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF). Objective This analysis evaluates the cost-effectiveness of catheter ablation plus GDMT vs medical therapy alone in patients with end-stage HF and AF referred for HTx evaluation. Methods In CASTLE-HTx, we randomized 194 patients in end-stage HF and AF to receive catheter ablation and GDMT (n = 97) or medical therapy alone (n = 97). Details of study design, outcome definitions, and results have been published. A cohort-based Markov model projected lifetime costs, life-years (LYs), and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) from the perspective of the German statutory health insurance system using 3-year outcomes from CASTLE-HTx. Results In lifetime projections, the combination of AF ablation and GDMT was associated with a mean survival gain of ∼1.7 LYs per patient at an incremental cost of ∼€12,000, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of ∼€7300 per LY gained. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios per QALY in lifetime projections (€8600) and at 36 months (€30,400) were below €50,000 per QALY, indicating cost-effectiveness at contemporary thresholds. Within 36 months, this survival benefit resulted in a gain of 0.34 LYs, reflecting prevention of death and worsening HF. The long-term benefit emerged early and remained consistent across sensitivity analyses. Conclusion The combination of catheter ablation and GDMT is cost-effective and economically favorable in patients with end-stage HF and AF who are referred for HTx evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Boettger, Priyanka & Moersdorf, Maximilian & Sommer, Philipp & Marrouche, Nassir F. & Costard-Jaeckle, Angelika & Crijns, Harry J.G.M. & Bergau, Leonard & Fox, Henrik & Hindricks, Gerhard & Dagres, Ni, 2026. "Cost-effectiveness of catheter ablation in end-stage heart failure with atrial fibrillation: insights from CASTLE-HTx," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 138850, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:138850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/138850/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:138850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.