IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/130460.html

Revisiting central bank independence for the climate era: insights from the People's Bank of China

Author

Listed:
  • Larsen, Mathias
  • Jackson, James

Abstract

Climate change has become a concern for central banks, at least rhetorically. Questioning whether the banks walk the talk, a proliferating research agenda covers mandates, motives, expertise, and independence. Yet, it remains unappreciated that the only central bank with actual green monetary policies is not independent, namely, the People’s Bank of China (PBoC). Here, we explore the relation between independence and climate action through an in-depth, interview-based study of the PBoC, in comparison with the U.S. Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, and the Bank of England. First, we find that Western central banks indirectly promote financial institutions to consider climate issues, whereas the PBoC, most centrally, directly intervenes through monetary policy. Second, by examining legal independence, mandates, and government influence, we find that independence constrains Western central banks, while non-independence forces the PBoC to act. From this, we discuss how the climate era requires revisiting central bank independence.

Suggested Citation

  • Larsen, Mathias & Jackson, James, 2025. "Revisiting central bank independence for the climate era: insights from the People's Bank of China," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 130460, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:130460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/130460/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:130460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.