IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/130056.html

So good, but so far away? The effect of institutional distance on the parent CSR and subsidiary reputation link

Author

Listed:
  • Forcadell, Francisco Javier
  • Nájera, Juan José
  • Aracil, Elisa
  • Úbeda, Fernando

Abstract

Multinational enterprises (MNEs) leverage strategies of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) at the parent and subsidiary levels to build a reputation overseas. Nevertheless, institutional distance can weaken this connection in developing host countries, where MNEs face significant institutional voids. We explore the mechanisms through which CSR enhances subsidiary reputation, focusing on how stakeholders in host developing countries perceive CSR signals sent from headquarters. We further explore the moderating role of formal and informal institutional distance in this relationship. Using a panel of MNEs headquartered in developed countries and operating across Latin America, we employ a multi‐stakeholder indicator of the subsidiary reputation based on assessments from key host country stakeholders. The analysis controls for country, corporate, and subsidiary‐level factors, including a variable derived from big data analytics. By examining the cross‐country parent CSR signals and their subsidiary reputation effects, this study advances the international business literature, providing new insights into how institutional distance shapes the local reputational outcomes of parent CSR strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Forcadell, Francisco Javier & Nájera, Juan José & Aracil, Elisa & Úbeda, Fernando, 2025. "So good, but so far away? The effect of institutional distance on the parent CSR and subsidiary reputation link," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 130056, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:130056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/130056/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L81 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Retail and Wholesale Trade; e-Commerce

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:130056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.