IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/129983.html

Trump, U.S.-China competition, and the future of technology transfer

Author

Listed:
  • Minnich, John

Abstract

What do the geopolitical dynamics of the Trump era mean for future patterns of technology transfer to the Global South? Drawing on theories of oligopolistic competition in economics and historical cases of great power rivalry, I argue China’s rise and U.S.-China competition will likely increase opportunities for technology transfer to developing states, all else equal. However, great powers, like firms in oligopolistic markets, can compete or collude. Given President Trump’s desire for a “deal” with China, the implications of a U.S.-China “grand bargain” for investment and technology flows to other regions must be considered. Any agreement that sustainably lowers U.S.-China tensions could reduce both sides’ incentives to bolster independent spheres of economic influence, and in turn to trade technology for political support from Global South countries. Nonetheless, a stable deal will be hard to reach and harder to sustain. Insofar as U.S.-China rivalry improves low-income countries’ access to and ability to bargain for technology, it would be a small silver lining to an otherwise fraught situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Minnich, John, 2025. "Trump, U.S.-China competition, and the future of technology transfer," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 129983, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:129983
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/129983/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • N0 - Economic History - - General
    • L81 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Retail and Wholesale Trade; e-Commerce

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:129983. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.