IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/129981.html

The moral accounting of debts: productivity, deservingness and the consensual creation of Chapter XIII bankruptcy

Author

Listed:
  • Pang, Nicholas A.

Abstract

Chapter XIII's wage-earner payment plans are now the default form of personal bankruptcy in the USA. During the Great Depression, it was created as a voluntary choice and enacted with unanimous legislative support. Absent conflict between creditors and labor and social reformers, legislators agreed that Chapter XIII was for the benefit of both honorable insolvents and their fair creditors. How did wage-earner payment plans emerge out of a consensual legislative process? Employing a computational abductive approach on a wide range of legislative, media and bankruptcy records, I show that Chapter XIII's creation was facilitated by a 'moral accounting' that, based on their race and gender identities, positively evaluated most White men bankruptcy petitioners as 'deserving', even as it recognized occupational variations in their economic 'productivity'. This study highlights how racial discourses of 'deservingness' are central to the construction of credit markets as part of America's submerged welfare state.

Suggested Citation

  • Pang, Nicholas A., 2025. "The moral accounting of debts: productivity, deservingness and the consensual creation of Chapter XIII bankruptcy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 129981, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:129981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/129981/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • N0 - Economic History - - General
    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:129981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.