IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/129521.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Disruptive but costly: how upside-down logos backfire in consumer responses to brands

Author

Listed:
  • Baek, Tae Hyun
  • Yim, Mark Yi-Cheon
  • Park, Jooyoung
  • Cho, Areum

Abstract

Marketers are increasingly using unconventional design tactics to visually disrupt consumer expectations, like turning brand logos upside down. Across four experiments, this research examined how inverted logos influence consumer brand responses. In two binary choice tasks (Studies 1A and 1B), participants exhibited a lower preference for an inverted logo than a standard logo for branded products. Study 2 determined the psychological mechanism underlying this effect: inverted logos increase perceived unexpectedness, which increases perceptions of brand rebelliousness and, ultimately, reduces purchase intentions. Study 3 demonstrated that political ideology moderates this effect: more conservative, but not liberal, consumers respond negatively to inverted logos. Finally, we discussed the theoretical and practical implications for logo design and visual branding strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Baek, Tae Hyun & Yim, Mark Yi-Cheon & Park, Jooyoung & Cho, Areum, 2026. "Disruptive but costly: how upside-down logos backfire in consumer responses to brands," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 129521, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:129521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/129521/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L81 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Retail and Wholesale Trade; e-Commerce

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:129521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.