IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/117528.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The avoiding late diagnosis of ovarian cancer (ALDO) project; a pilot national surveillance programme for women with pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2

Author

Listed:
  • Philpott, Sue
  • Raikou, Maria
  • Manchanda, Ranjit
  • Lockley, Michelle
  • Singh, Naveena
  • Scott, Malcolm
  • Evans, D. Gareth
  • Adlard, Julian
  • Ahmed, Munaza
  • Edmondson, Richard
  • Woodward, Emma Roisin
  • Lamnisos, Athena
  • Balega, Janos
  • Brady, Angela F.
  • Sharma, Aarti
  • Izatt, Louise
  • Kulkarni, Anjana
  • Tripathi, Vishakha
  • Solomons, Joyce S.
  • Hayes, Kevin
  • Hanson, Helen
  • Snape, Katie
  • Side, Lucy
  • Skates, Steve
  • McGuire, Alistair
  • Rosenthal, Adam N.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our study aimed to establish 'real-world' performance and cost-effectiveness of ovarian cancer (OC) surveillance in women with pathogenic germline BRCA1/2 variants who defer risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). METHODS: Our study recruited 875 female BRCA1/2-heterozygotes at 13 UK centres and via an online media campaign, with 767 undergoing at least one 4-monthly surveillance test with the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm (ROCA) test. Surveillance performance was calculated with modelling of occult cancers detected at RRSO. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated using Markov population cohort simulation. RESULTS: Our study identified 8 OCs during 1277 women screen years: 2 occult OCs at RRSO (both stage 1a), and 6 screen-detected; 3 of 6 (50%) were ≤stage 3a and 5 of 6 (83%) were completely surgically cytoreduced. Modelled sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) for OC were 87.5% (95% CI, 47.3 to 99.7), 99.9% (99.9-100), 75% (34.9-96.8) and 99.9% (99.9-100), respectively. The predicted number of quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained by surveillance was 0.179 with an ICER cost -saving of -£102,496/QALY. CONCLUSION: OC surveillance for women deferring RRSO in a 'real-world' setting is feasible and demonstrates similar performance to research trials; it down-stages OC, leading to a high complete cytoreduction rate and is cost-saving in the UK National Health Service (NHS) setting. While RRSO remains recommended management, ROCA-based surveillance may be considered for female BRCA-heterozygotes who are deferring such surgery.

Suggested Citation

  • Philpott, Sue & Raikou, Maria & Manchanda, Ranjit & Lockley, Michelle & Singh, Naveena & Scott, Malcolm & Evans, D. Gareth & Adlard, Julian & Ahmed, Munaza & Edmondson, Richard & Woodward, Emma Roisin, 2023. "The avoiding late diagnosis of ovarian cancer (ALDO) project; a pilot national surveillance programme for women with pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117528, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:117528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/117528/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    costs and cost analysis; early diagnosis; economics; genetic predisposition to disease; women's health;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:117528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.