IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/113607.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reassessing diabetes and APOE genotype as potential interacting risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease

Author

Listed:
  • Ravipati, Kaushik
  • Chen, Yunxiao
  • Manns, Joseph R.

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether diabetes alone or in association with Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 genotype increases the risk of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 33,456 participants from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center database. Results: Participants with one or two APOE ε4 alleles had 2.71 (CI:2.55–2.88) and 9.37 (CI:8.14–10.78) times higher odds of AD diagnosis, respectively, relative to those with zero ε4 alleles. In contrast, diabetic participants showed 1.07 (CI:0.96–1.18) times higher odds of AD relative to nondiabetics. Diabetes did not exacerbate the odds of AD in APOE ε4 carriers. APOE ε4 carriage was correlated with declines in long-term memory and verbal fluency, which were strongly correlated with conversion to AD. However, diabetes was correlated with working memory decline, which had a relatively weak correlation with AD. Conclusions: Unlike APOE ε4, there was little evidence that diabetes was a risk factor for AD.

Suggested Citation

  • Ravipati, Kaushik & Chen, Yunxiao & Manns, Joseph R., 2022. "Reassessing diabetes and APOE genotype as potential interacting risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113607, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:113607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/113607/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Alzheimer’s Disease; APOE ε4 allele; diabetes; long-term memory; structural equation modeling; working memory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:113607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.