IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The effect of direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising on health choices: an empirical investigation using panel data

Listed author(s):
  • Mark Showalter
  • James Cardon

In 1997, the FDA relaxed regulations on direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising for pharmaceutical products. This has led to a substantial increase in such expenditures which in turn raises some important public policy questions. For example, has this increase in DTC advertising affected the doctor-patient relationship in a way that distorts optimal choice of care? The benign view of such advertising is that DTC ads are simply informative and thus lead consumers to obtain better care than would have occurred otherwise. An opposing view is that DTC advertising entices consumers to obtain treatments that are unnecessary or more expensive than “optimal” treatment (For general discussions, see Berndt et al, AER 1995; Iizuka, T. and G. Jin, working paper 2002). This paper will investigate the effects of DTC advertising on a relatively rich panel data of roughly 50,000 individuals obtained from an insurance firm. Included in this data are all prescription drugs purchases for covered individuals from 1997-2001, as well as all other health services provided for the individuals through the insurance company. Demographic variables are also available for the individuals. We will use monthly DTC expenditures in specific geographic areas for a set of pharmaceutical products (provided by a major pharmaceutical firm) to measure the impact of expenditures on 1) physician visits, and 2) prescriptions written for the product, controlling for other observable characteristics. We will also examine the impact on brand switching within a therapeutic class. We build on the work of others by exploiting the panel nature of the data, using recently-developed estimators for non-linear panel data models (Honore, B. and E. Kyriazidou, ECM, 2000).

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Econometric Society in its series Econometric Society 2004 North American Winter Meetings with number 550.

in new window

Date of creation: 11 Aug 2004
Handle: RePEc:ecm:nawm04:550
Contact details of provider: Phone: 1 212 998 3820
Fax: 1 212 995 4487
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:nawm04:550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.