IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Gender Wage Gaps in the Netherlands with Sample Selection Adjustments

Listed author(s):
  • James Albrecht
  • Aico van Vuuren

In this paper, we use quantile regression methods to analyze the gender gap in the Netherlands. Specifically, we use data from the 1992 wave of the OSA Labour Survey Panel to decompose the difference between the distributions of wages for males and females who are employed full-time. The decomposition technique we use is the Machado and Mata (2000) method, as applied in Albrecht, Bj`rklund and Vroman (2003). There is strong evidence of a glass ceiling effect in the Netherlands; i.e., the gender log wage gap is greater for higher quantiles. Because part-time work is common among women in the Netherlands and because the female participation rate is relatively low, sample selection is a serious issue. We apply Buchinsky’s technique for quantile regression with selectivity bias correction and estimate a series of quantile regressions to find the marginal contributions of individual characteristics to log wages for men and for women at various quantiles in their respective wage distributions. We then use the Machado/Mata technique amended to deal with sample selection to construct a counterfactual distribution, namely, the distribution of wages that would prevail among women were women to work full-time to the same extent as men do. This allows us to decompose the gender gap at different quantiles taking account of sample selection and to determine how much of the gap is due to differences in the labor market characteristics of men and women and how much is due to gender differences in rewards to these characteristics

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Econometric Society in its series Econometric Society 2004 North American Winter Meetings with number 504.

in new window

Date of creation: 11 Aug 2004
Handle: RePEc:ecm:nawm04:504
Contact details of provider: Phone: 1 212 998 3820
Fax: 1 212 995 4487
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:nawm04:504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.