IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Conditional Welfare Comparisons of Monetary Policy Rules

  • Andy Levin
  • Jinill Kim

Various approaches to optimal monetary policy have been used to select time-invariant policy rules, including the timeless perspective approach by Woodford (1999) and the unconditional expected utility criterion of McCallum (2000). In this paper, we argue instead that policy rules should be evaluated in terms of the household’s conditional welfare at the time of adoption, integrated over the ergodic distribution of initial conditions generated by the previous policy. Thus, the performance of time-invariant rules can be compared against the benchmark value achieved by the Ramsey solution, while ensuring that the coefficients of the rule are not fine-tuned to specific values of the initial conditions. Finally, using the benchmark new Keynesian model, we consider the case when the initial conditions are generated by optimal policy under discretion, and show that the optimal time-invariant rule yields conditional welfare superior to that of the rules previously proposed in the lite

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Econometric Society in its series Econometric Society 2004 Far Eastern Meetings with number 667.

in new window

Date of creation: 11 Aug 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ecm:feam04:667
Contact details of provider: Phone: 1 212 998 3820
Fax: 1 212 995 4487
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:feam04:667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.