Vertical Control and Horizontal Coordination in Dynamic Oligopoly Pricing: Empirical Evidence from a Natural Supergame Experiment in Gasoline Markets
This paper examines empirically the playersâ€™ intrabrand vertical price control, interbrand horizontal pricing coordination, and their learning process to equilibrium in a rare natural experiment of supergame where a well defined simultaneous-move price setting stage game is repeated every 24 hours. The experiment occurred in Western Australia where a state law forces all gasoline service stations to report to the government, by 2:00 pm each day, their next-day retail prices. With a dataset that includes the daily price of virtually every retail outlet in a metropolitan area for 34 months, this paper shows that various forms of vertical price restraints are used by the upstream firms to control and synchronize intrabrand price, price leadership and short-term commitment are used to enable the upstream firms to effectively set prices sequentially, and punishment of short-duration and trial-and-error are used to get onto the nonsynchronization equilibrium
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||11 Aug 2004|
|Contact details of provider:|| Phone: 1 212 998 3820|
Fax: 1 212 995 4487
Web page: http://www.econometricsociety.org/pastmeetings.asp
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:ausm04:42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.