IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/upafin/12-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Case for Bail-Ins

Author

Listed:
  • Huertas, Thomas F.

    (Ernst & Young LLP, London)

Abstract

The case for bail-ins is simple. Bail-ins are superior to bail-outs, and bail-ins are superior to insolvency and liquidation. Bail-ins are potentially a powerful resolution tool, that can help make banks, even the largest and most complex banks, 'safe to fail'. Bail-ins can potentially help assure that investors, not taxpayers, bear the cost of bank failure. And bail-ins can materially help reduce both the social cost and the disruption to markets that insolvency and liquidation could cause. So bail-ins deserve a place in the resolution tool kit that should be at authorities' disposal, if a bank fails to meet threshold conditions and needs to be resolved. But for bail-ins to be effective, they will need to be combined with other tools, and both banks and authorities will need to take preparatory measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Huertas, Thomas F., 2012. "The Case for Bail-Ins," Working Papers 12-17, University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School, Weiss Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecl:upafin:12-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fic.wharton.upenn.edu/fic/papers/12/12-17.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas F. Huertas, 2011. "Crisis: Cause, Containment and Cure," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, edition 2, number 978-0-230-32135-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huertas, Thomas F., 2021. "Reset required: The euro area crisis management and deposit insurance framework," SAFE White Paper Series 85, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    2. Huertas, Thomas F., 2020. "Plug the gap: Make resolution ready for corona," SAFE White Paper Series 73, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    3. Petras, Matthias, 2022. "Increasing profitability through contingent convertible capital: Empirical evidence from European banks," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:upafin:12-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wcupaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.