IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/stabus/repececlstabus3553.html

Accrual Accounting and Resource Allocation: A General Equilibrium Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Choi, Jung Ho

    (Stanford University)

Abstract

I evaluate the role of accrual accounting in improving rms' production decisions and resource allocation across rms. I introduce both cash ow and accounting earnings as imperfect measures of performance into a general equilibrium model with heterogeneous rms under imperfect information. The model demonstrates rms' more informed decisions with an improved measure of performance lead to more resources being allocated to potentially high-productivity firms through the product and input markets. The estimated parameter values are consistent with accrual accounting improving managers' information about future productivity by providing a better measure of performance. The quantitative analysis suggests having accrual accounting information in addition to cash accounting information leads to a 0.5% increase in aggregate productivity and a 0.7% increase in aggregate output through resource allocation in the United States. The estimates are larger in China and India as benchmarks for developing countries: a 1.5%-2.1% increase in aggregate productivity and a 2.3%-3.2% increase in aggregate output. Overall, I demonstrate accrual accounting plays an important role in determining aggregate productivity through resource allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • Choi, Jung Ho, 2018. "Accrual Accounting and Resource Allocation: A General Equilibrium Analysis," Research Papers repec:ecl:stabus:3553, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:repec:ecl:stabus:3553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/gsb-cmis/gsb-cmis-download-auth/436426
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Chengrui & Li, Zhaohong & Xu, Jiaqian & Luo, Yiyang, 2024. "Accounting information quality, firm ownership and technology innovation: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    2. Christian Leuz, 2018. "Evidence-based policymaking: promise, challenges and opportunities for accounting and financial markets research," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(5), pages 582-608, July.
    3. George‐Levi Gayle & Chen Li & Robert A. Miller, 2022. "Was Sarbanes–Oxley Costly? Evidence from Optimal Contracting on CEO Compensation," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 60(4), pages 1189-1234, September.
    4. Matthias Breuer & David Windisch, 2019. "Investment Dynamics and Earnings‐Return Properties: A Structural Approach," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 57(3), pages 639-674, June.
    5. van der Geest, Jesse, 2024. "Economic effects of tax avoidance and compliance," Other publications TiSEM aaca33bf-975d-4e21-9b5f-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Vijaya Krishna Kanaparthi, 2023. "Examining the Plausible Applications of Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning in Accounts Payable Improvement," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-14, July.
    7. Maureen F. McNichols & Stephen R. Stubben, 2018. "Research Design Issues in Studies Using Discretionary Accruals," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 54(2), pages 227-246, June.
    8. Frank S. Zhou, 2021. "Disclosure Dynamics and Investor Learning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3429-3446, June.
    9. Biehl, Henrike & Bleibtreu, Christopher & Stefani, Ulrike, 2024. "The real effects of financial reporting: Evidence and suggestions for future research," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    10. Kim, Jinhwan & Olbert, Marcel, 2022. "How does private firm disclosure affect demand for public firm equity? Evidence from the global equity market," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(2).
    11. Breuer, Matthias & Leuz, Christian & Vanhaverbeke, Steven, 2025. "Reporting regulation and corporate innovation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(1).
    12. Matthias Breuer & Eva Labro & Haresh Sapra & Anastasia A. Zakolyukina, 2024. "Bridging Theory and Empirical Research in Accounting," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 62(3), pages 1121-1139, June.
    13. Roychowdhury, Sugata & Shroff, Nemit & Verdi, Rodrigo S., 2019. "The effects of financial reporting and disclosure on corporate investment: A review," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:repec:ecl:stabus:3553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsstaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.