IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/stabus/3974.html

Reserves Were Not So Ample after All

Author

Listed:
  • Copeland, Adam

    (FRBNY)

  • Duffie, Darrell

    (Stanford GSB)

  • Yang, Yilin (David)

    (Stanford GSB)

Abstract

The Federal Reserve’s “balance-sheet normalization,†which reduced aggregate reserves between 2017 and September 2019, increased repo rate distortions, the severity of rate spikes, and intraday payment timing stresses, culminating with a significant disruption in Treasury repo markets in mid-September 2019. We show that repo rates rose above efficient-market levels when the total reserve balances held at the Federal Reserve by the largest repo-active bank holding companies declined and that repo rate spikes are strongly associated with delayed intraday payments of reserves to these large bank holding companies. Intraday payment timing stresses are magnified by early-morning settlement of Treasury security issuances. Substantially higher aggregate levels of reserves than existed in the period leading up to September 2019 would likely have eliminated most or all of these payment timing stresses and repo rate spikes.

Suggested Citation

  • Copeland, Adam & Duffie, Darrell & Yang, Yilin (David), 2021. "Reserves Were Not So Ample after All," Research Papers 3974, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:3974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/working-papers/reserves-were-not-so-ample-after-all
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Engel, Charles & Bianchi, Javier & Bigio, Saki, 2021. "Scrambling for Dollars: International Liquidity, Banks and Exchange Rates," CEPR Discussion Papers 16712, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Lu, Yundi & Valcarcel, Victor J., 2024. "A tale of two tightenings," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    3. Girotti, Mattia & Horny, Guillaume, 2023. "Monetary policy transmission through banks when liquidity is abundant but unevenly distributed," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    4. Smith, A. Lee & Valcarcel, Victor J., 2023. "The financial market effects of unwinding the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    5. d'Avernas, Adrien & Vandeweyer, Quentin & Petersen, Damon, 2025. "The central bank’s balance sheet and treasury market disruptions," Working Paper Series 3066, European Central Bank.
    6. Eisenschmidt, Jens & Ma, Yiming & Zhang, Anthony Lee, 2024. "Monetary policy transmission in segmented markets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    7. Jordan Barone & Alain P. Chaboud & Adam Copeland & Cullen Kavoussi & Frank M. Keane & Seth Searls, 2023. "The Global Dash for Cash: Why Sovereign Bond Market Functioning Varied across Jurisdictions in March 2020," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 29(3), pages 1-29, December.
    8. Guillaume Bazot & Eric Monnet & Matthias Morys, 2024. "Central banks and the absorption of international shocks (1891-2019)," Working Papers halshs-04778323, HAL.
    9. Koresh Galil & Lior David-Pur & Mosi Rosenboim & Offer Moshe Shapir, 2023. "Shedding Light on the Dynamics of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR)," Working Papers 2310, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
    10. David Skovmand & Jacob Bjerre Skov, 2022. "Decomposing LIBOR in Transition: Evidence from the Futures Markets," Papers 2201.06930, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    11. Mark Paddrik & Carlos Ramirez, 2025. "Treasury Tri-party Repo Pricing," Working Papers 25-07, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury.
    12. Benoit Nguyen & Davide Tomio & Miklos Vari, 2023. "Safe Asset Scarcity and Monetary Policy Transmission," Working papers 934, Banque de France.
    13. Mark A. Carlson & Zack Saravay & Mary Tian, 2025. "Fed Repo Operations and Dealer Intermediation," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2025-052, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    14. Jonathan Witmer, 2025. "The Optimum Quantity of Central Bank Reserves," Staff Working Papers 25-15, Bank of Canada.
    15. Egemen Eren & Philip Wooldridge, 2021. "Non-bank financial institutions and the functioning of government bond markets," BIS Papers, Bank for International Settlements, number 119, February.
    16. Dautović, Ernest & Gambacorta, Leonardo & Reghezza, Alessio, 2023. "Supervisory Policy Stimulus: Evidence from the Euro Area Dividend Recommendation," CEPR Discussion Papers 18175, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    17. Paulick, Jan, 2022. "Financial market infrastructures : Essays on liquidity, participant behaviour and information extraction," Other publications TiSEM 004942ed-f68d-40cc-a830-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Kahn, R. Jay & McCormick, Matthew & Nguyen, Vy & Paddrik, Mark & Young, H. Peyton, 2023. "Anatomy of the Repo Rate Spikes in September 2019," Journal of Financial Crises, Yale Program on Financial Stability (YPFS), vol. 5(4), pages 1-25, July.
    19. Corell, Felix, 2025. "Hand-to-mouth banks: Deposit inflows and the marginal propensity to lend," LawFin Working Paper Series 59, Goethe University, Center for Advanced Studies on the Foundations of Law and Finance (LawFin).
    20. Corell, Felix, 2025. "Hand-to-mouth banks: deposit inflows and the marginal propensity to lend," Working Paper Series 3085, European Central Bank.
    21. John Caramichael & Gordon Y. Liao, 2022. "Stablecoins: Growth Potential and Impact on Banking," International Finance Discussion Papers 1334, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D47 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Market Design
    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:3974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsstaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.