IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/stabus/2106.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dissemination, Direct-Access Information Technology and Information Asymmetry

Author

Listed:
  • Blakespoor, Elizabeth

    (Stanford University)

  • Miller, Gregory S.

    (University of MI)

  • White, Hal D.

    (University of MI)

Abstract

Firm disclosures often reach only a portion of investors, which results in information asymmetry among investors, and therefore lower market liquidity. This issue is particularly salient for firms that are not highly visible, as they tend not to receive broad news dissemination via traditional intermediaries, such as the press. This paper examines whether firms can reduce information asymmetry by using a new information technology to increase the breadth of dissemination of firm disclosures. Using a sample of technology firms, we examine the impact of using Twitter to send market participants links to press releases that are provided via traditional disclosure methods. We find this additional dissemination of firm-initiated news via Twitter is associated with lower bid-ask spreads and greater depths, consistent with a reduction in information asymmetry. Moreover, this result holds mainly for less visible firms, consistent with them being in greater need of this additional dissemination channel. We also decompose spread into an information asymmetry component and a non-information asymmetry component, and we find that dissemination via Twitter is negatively associated with the information asymmetry component. Finally, we examine the impact of dissemination on a volume-based measure of liquidity, and find that dissemination is positively associated with liquidity.

Suggested Citation

  • Blakespoor, Elizabeth & Miller, Gregory S. & White, Hal D., 2012. "Dissemination, Direct-Access Information Technology and Information Asymmetry," Research Papers 2106, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:2106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP2106.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anenberg, Elliot & Kung, Edward, 2015. "Information technology and product variety in the city: The case of food trucks," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 60-78.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:2106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsstaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.