IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing the Efficiency Gains from Further Liberalization


  • Frankel, Jeffrey

    (Harvard U)


The paper begins by arguing that globalization, which here means reductions in the remaining barriers to international trade, still has a long way to go. Next it briefly reviews the evidence on the economic benefits from globalization, followed by a consideration of the non-economic effects in such areas as the environment. A section on what should be the priority areas for multilateral trade negotiations considers form (regional vs. multilateral, the new role of developing countries, the new role of NGOs), sectors (textiles, other manufactures, agriculture, services), and other issues (anti-dumping, competition policy, investment, and government procurement). The paper concludes with a rough quantitative estimate of the economic benefits of a new WTO round. Other authors, using static models, have estimated that a new round might raise trade over the next five years by about $300 billion, and that this might raise global welfare on the order of 1 per cent of world income. But the implied 20 per cent increase in global trade volumes may have further benefits. The author’s back-of-the-envelope attempt to take into account also dynamic gains says that if multilateral liberalization raised the global level of merchandise trade from 37 per cent of world income to 45 per cent, it could raise global income per capita by roughly 2 per cent over the subsequent two decades.

Suggested Citation

  • Frankel, Jeffrey, 2001. "Assessing the Efficiency Gains from Further Liberalization," Working Paper Series rwp01-030, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp01-030

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Kan Li & Randall Morck & Fan Yang & Bernard Yeung, 2004. "Firm-Specific Variation and Openness in Emerging Markets," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 86(3), pages 658-669, August.
    2. He, Kathy S. & Morck, Randall & Yeung, Bernard, 2003. "Corporate Stability and Economic Growth," CEI Working Paper Series 2003-12, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    3. Fogel, Kathy & Morck, Randall & Yeung, Bernard, 2008. "Big business stability and economic growth: Is what's good for General Motors good for America?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 83-108, July.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp01-030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.