Assessing the Efficiency Gains from Further Liberalization
The paper begins by arguing that globalization, which here means reductions in the remaining barriers to international trade, still has a long way to go. Next it briefly reviews the evidence on the economic benefits from globalization, followed by a consideration of the non-economic effects in such areas as the environment. A section on what should be the priority areas for multilateral trade negotiations considers form (regional vs. multilateral, the new role of developing countries, the new role of NGOs), sectors (textiles, other manufactures, agriculture, services), and other issues (anti-dumping, competition policy, investment, and government procurement). The paper concludes with a rough quantitative estimate of the economic benefits of a new WTO round. Other authors, using static models, have estimated that a new round might raise trade over the next five years by about $300 billion, and that this might raise global welfare on the order of 1 per cent of world income. But the implied 20 per cent increase in global trade volumes may have further benefits. The author’s back-of-the-envelope attempt to take into account also dynamic gains says that if multilateral liberalization raised the global level of merchandise trade from 37 per cent of world income to 45 per cent, it could raise global income per capita by roughly 2 per cent over the subsequent two decades.
|Date of creation:||Sep 2001|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 79 JFK Street, Cambridge, MA 02138|
Web page: http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/research/working_papers/index.htm
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp01-030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.