IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eca/wpaper/2013-413551.html

Family matters: an empirical analysis of how divisionals and secondary patents extend legal uncertainty in life sciences

Author

Listed:
  • Elise Petit
  • Nadin WN Woergoetter
  • Peeyush SP Sahu
  • Nicolas van Zeebroeck

Abstract

When a patent application is pending, it is uncertain whether a patent will be granted and, if so, what protection it will confer. If the validity of the patent is then challenged, uncertainty continues until a final decision in opposition is obtained. This uncertainty extends when multiple applications surround a single innovation, a phenomenon that is common in life sciences and can therefore have a great impact on healthcare systems and patients. This article examines whether examination duration, and therefore the period of uncertainty, at the European Patent Office (EPO) varies systematically with parent and divisional applications, secondary patenting, and the economic value of the associated drug. Using bulk EPO Register data and IQVIA Ark5/MIDAS®6 data, 15,737 patent applications filed at the EPO between 1978 and 2026 Q1 are linked to a drug. Cox proportional hazards models show that parent applications and secondary patents are associated with significantly longer pendency than single applications, particularly for high-value drugs. Additional indicators trace where and how these delays arise. The findings suggest that delays are connected to the combined use of several procedural rights, both across a patent family and within individual applications, and are not limited to multi-generation families.

Suggested Citation

  • Elise Petit & Nadin WN Woergoetter & Peeyush SP Sahu & Nicolas van Zeebroeck, 2026. "Family matters: an empirical analysis of how divisionals and secondary patents extend legal uncertainty in life sciences," Working Papers ECARES 2026-29, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/413551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/413551/3/WP_ECRAES_2026_29_Strategic_use.pdf
    File Function: Œuvre complète ou partie de l'œuvre
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy
    • L65 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Chemicals; Rubber; Drugs; Biotechnology; Plastics
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • K11 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Property Law
    • C41 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Duration Analysis; Optimal Timing Strategies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/413551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/arulbbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.