IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Información privilegiada según un tribunal español

Listed author(s):
  • Fernandez, Pablo


    (IESE Business School)

El 17 de julio de 2009, la sección 17ª de la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid publicó una sentencia en la que absolvía al actual presidente de Telefónica y a su sobrino del delito de uso de información privilegiada por haber prescrito. Varios inversores y empresarios extranjeros manifestaron su enorme perplejidad -no por la absolución por prescripción- sino porque el tribunal dijo que hubo delito. La perplejidad de los inversores y empresarios también provenía de que un Tribunal de un país miembro de la Unión Europea pudiera escribir en una sentencia afirmaciones como las que se recogen en el documento, que contradicen varias evidencias elementales y muy bien documentadas en finanzas.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by IESE Business School in its series IESE Research Papers with number D/827.

in new window

Length: 26 pages
Date of creation: 17 Sep 2009
Handle: RePEc:ebg:iesewp:d-0827
Contact details of provider: Postal:
IESE Business School, Av Pearson 21, 08034 Barcelona, SPAIN

Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebg:iesewp:d-0827. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Noelia Romero)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.