IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dun/dpaper/304.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Patients’ experience of their GP practice in the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Allanson
  • Paul Logan

Abstract

This paper explores the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients’ experiences of general practice in England using multicategory response data from the 2020 and 2021 GP Patient Surveys, where the former was conducted in the run up to the first UK national lockdown at the end of March 2020 and the latter a year later. It offers a novel analysis of changes in patients’ experience that provides measures of practice quality change which are sensitive to changes in the distribution of patients across the full set of response categories not just in the proportion meeting some binary quality threshold. We find a 5.8 percentage point difference between the proportions of patients whose experience got better rather than worse between the two years, whereas the proportion of patients describing their experience as ‘good’ only increased by 1.2 percentage points. Patients in 2021 were likely to rate their GP more highly if their last appointment was conducted face-to-face at their own practice rather than over the phone or online, suggesting that the improvement in patients’ rating of GP services was not the result of the prescribed move towards the greater use of remote consultations. Practice-level changes exhibit reversion towards the GP service quality of England as a whole, likely reflecting some combination of sampling variability and transitory shocks to patient experience at both patient and practice levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Allanson & Paul Logan, 2022. "Patients’ experience of their GP practice in the COVID-19 pandemic," Dundee Discussion Papers in Economics 304, Economic Studies, University of Dundee, revised Jun 2022.
  • Handle: RePEc:dun:dpaper:304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/en/publications/dundee-discussion-papers-in-economics-304-patients-experience-of-
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Allanson & Richard Cookson, 2021. "Measuring healthcare quality variation using multicategory ordinal data: an application to primary care services in England," Dundee Discussion Papers in Economics 302, Economic Studies, University of Dundee.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      Patient-reported experience measures; primary care services; mobility analysis; COVID-19; England;
      All these keywords.

      JEL classification:

      • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
      • I14 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Inequality
      • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

      NEP fields

      This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dun:dpaper:304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andrzej Kwiatkowski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dedunuk.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.