IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Bildungsstandards = Lernzielorientierung reloaded?

  • Thomas Retzmann


    (Universitaet Duisburg-Essen)

Registered author(s):

    Seit dem PISA-Schock und dem Erscheinen der Expertise Zur Entwicklung nationaler Bildungsstandards wird die Standardisierungsdiskussion in allen Fachdidaktiken gefuehrt. Schulische Bildung soll demzufolge nicht mehr allein ueber den Input, sondern vor allem ueber den Output gesteuert werden. Die aktuelle Debatte um die Kompetenzorientierung und Standardisierung der Bildung erinnert an vielen Stellen an die Debatte um die Lernzielorientierung des Unterrichts, die in den siebziger Jahren, spaetestens jedoch Anfang der achtziger Jahre, ihren Scheitelpunkt hatte. Daher stellt sich die Frage nach den Unterschieden und Gemeinsamkeiten beider Programme. In diesem Beitrag wird untersucht, ob und inwieweit das Setzen von Bildungsstandards etwas anderes ist als die Bestimmung von Lernzielen oder ob es sich um alten Wein in neuen Schlaeuchen handelt. Anders formuliert: Sind die Bildungsstandards etwas anderes als die Lernzielorientierung reloaded?

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: First version, 2011
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by University of Duisburg-Essen, Chair of Economics and Economic Education in its series Working Papers with number 1102.

    in new window

    Length: 21
    Date of creation: Nov 2011
    Handle: RePEc:duj:wpaper:1102
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Universitätsstrasse 12, 45117 Essen

    Phone: 0201 - 183 3633
    Fax: 0201 - 183 2292
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:duj:wpaper:1102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.