Author
Listed:
- Olivia Bertelli
(DIAL-LEDa, UMR CNRS 8007 & IRD 260, Universite Paris-Dauphine, PSL Research University)
- Thomas Calvo
(IRD, DIAL-LEDa, UMR CNRS 8007 & IRD 260, Universite Paris-Dauphine, PSL Research University)
- Emmanuelle Lavallée
(DIAL-LEDa, UMR CNRS 8007 & IRD 260, Universite Paris-Dauphine, PSL Research University)
- Lydie Lazure
(DIAL-LEDa, UMR CNRS 8007 & IRD 260, Universite Paris-Dauphine, PSL Research University)
- Marion Mercier
(CNRS, DIAL-LEDa, UMR CNRS 8007 & IRD 260, Universite Paris-Dauphine, PSL Research University)
- Sandrine Mesplé-Somps
(IRD, DIAL-LEDa, UMR CNRS 8007 & IRD 260, Universite Paris-Dauphine, PSL Research University)
Abstract
Gender-based violence (GBV) is widespread across the world, and Mali is one of the countries characterized by the highest prevalence rates. Following up on a paper studying men’s justifications for and perpetration of GBV in Bamako, the capital city, we elicit women’s attitudes towards early marriage, female genital mutilation (FGM) and intimate partner violence (IPV). We administer four list experiments (LEs), whose results are then compared to those of direct questions to estimate response biases. Additionally, we question women about their second-order beliefs on men and women’s attitudes towards FGM and IPV in Bamako. Our results show that women tend to misreport their attitudes towards GBV. While they declare attitudes that are less favorable to early marriage and IPV than what the LE reveals, the reverse is true as far as FGM is concerned. Women, like men (Bertelli et al., 2025), are less conservative than what they openly declare about FGM. Besides, women’s perception of the support for FGM aligns relatively well with what men and women, respectively, openly declare. The misperception of the actual prevailing attitudes towards FGM could participate in the persistence of a practice which is, in fact, much less supported than what people declare and believe.
Suggested Citation
Olivia Bertelli & Thomas Calvo & Emmanuelle Lavallée & Lydie Lazure & Marion Mercier & Sandrine Mesplé-Somps, 2026.
"Women’s perceptions of gender-based violence in Mali,"
Working Papers
DT/2026/07, DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation).
Handle:
RePEc:dia:wpaper:dt202607
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
- J12 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Marriage; Marital Dissolution; Family Structure
- J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
- O55 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Africa
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dia:wpaper:dt202607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Loic Le Pezennec (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diallfr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.