IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The distributional effects of growth : case studies vs. Cross-country regressions

Listed author(s):
  • François Bourguignon

Considerable attention has been devoted lately to the empirical relationship between growth and inequality. Mostly based on cross-sectional econometric analysis, this literature is largely inconclusive in the sense that no systematically significant relationship has been found between distribution indicators and growth rates or their known determinants. Were such a result granted, it would be tempting to conclude that ‘growth is good for the poor’ whatever the nature of growth, as recently done in an influential paper by Dollar and Kraay (2001). The present paper adopts a different perspective. Using a few case studies and an original micro-economic methodology for decomposing time changes in the distribution of income, it shows that important socio-demographic factors are at work that may contribute to hiding the true distributional consequences of growth during a particular period of time in a given country. Because of the inherent difficulty of controlling for these factors, aggregate cross-country analysis may thus not be the best method for the study of the growth-inequality relationship.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by DELTA (Ecole normale supérieure) in its series DELTA Working Papers with number 2002-23.

in new window

Date of creation: 2002
Handle: RePEc:del:abcdef:2002-23
Contact details of provider: Postal:
48 boulevard Jourdan - 75014 Paris

Phone: 01 43 13 63 00
Fax: 01 43 13 63 10
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:del:abcdef:2002-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.