IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cwm/wpaper/143.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How Predictable are Environmental Compliance Inspections?

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah L. Stafford

    () (Department of Economics, College of William and Mary)

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to examine the timing of environmental compliance inspections and determine the extent to which such inspections can be predicted. The paper focuses on modeling the inspections at hazardous waste facilities in the U.S. using detailed data on individual inspections and facilities. The paper uses a number of parametric and semi-parametric duration models to predict the timing of inspections and finds that the Exponential model provides the best balance in terms of the explanatory power and simplicity of the model. However, even with this model it is difficult to accurately predict the timing of most compliance inspections. The paper also examines the extent to which using data on individual inspections can improve empirical predictions about aggregate inspections. If the goal is to estimate the annual number of inspections at hazardous waste facilities, neither the Exponential model or a Poisson model is clearly superior. Which model is more appropriate depends on the question the researcher wants to answer. Similarly, if the focus is on whether any inspection occurred in a given time period, the benefits of using the Exponential model depend on the nature of the questions to be answered. While the Exponential model performs better than a Probit model in predicting which entities will be inspected, it also results in a higher number of "false positives," that is predicting an inspection when no inspection actually occurs.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah L. Stafford, 2013. "How Predictable are Environmental Compliance Inspections?," Working Papers 143, Department of Economics, College of William and Mary.
  • Handle: RePEc:cwm:wpaper:143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economics.wm.edu/wp/cwm_wp143.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:eee:ecolec:v:147:y:2018:i:c:p:253-263 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Hazardous Waste; Duration Model; Inspection Timing;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cwm:wpaper:143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Daifeng He) or (Alfredo Pereira). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/decwmus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.