IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/crrwps/wp2023-02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What Matters for Annuity Demand: Objective Life Expectancy or Subjective Survival Pessimism?

Author

Listed:
  • Karolos Arapakis
  • Gal Wettstein

Abstract

Objective life expectancy and subjective survival pessimism (defined as the difference between objective and subjective life expectancy) may both affect the demand for annuities. The question this project answers is: how do these two explanations contribute to annuitization decisions in practice? To explore this question, the analysis estimates regression models that include objective life expectancy, subjective survival pessimism, and other characteristics that are linked to annuitization decisions. The results show that, as one would expect, individuals with higher objective life expectancy are more likely to buy an annuity. Similarly, less pessimistic individuals are also more likely to buy an annuity. A one-year rise in objective life expectancy increases the probability of buying an annuity product by 0.20 percentage points, which is nearly nine times larger than a one-year decline in pessimism.

Suggested Citation

  • Karolos Arapakis & Gal Wettstein, 2023. "What Matters for Annuity Demand: Objective Life Expectancy or Subjective Survival Pessimism?," Working Papers, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College wp2023-02, Center for Retirement Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:crr:crrwps:wp2023-02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://crr.bc.edu/working-papers/what-matters-for-annuity-demand-objective-life-expectancy-or-subjective-survival-pessimism/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:crrwps:wp2023-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.