IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/crrwps/wp2012-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Should Households Base Asset Decumulation Strategies on Required Minimum Distribution Tables?

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Sun
  • Anthony Webb

Abstract

Households managing wealth decumulation in retirement must trade off the risk of outliving their wealth against the cost of unnecessarily restricting their consumption. Devising an optimal decumulation plan, reflecting uncertain mortality and asset returns, is well beyond the abilities of most households, who likely rely on rules of thumb. Using numerical optimization, we compare one such rule of thumb – consuming the age-related percentage of remaining wealth specified in the IRS Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) tables – with alternatives and with the theoretical optimal. We show that in models that incorporate uncertain investment returns a decumulation strategy based on the RMD tables performs better than plausible alternatives, such as spending the interest and dividends, consuming a fixed 4 percent of initial wealth, or decumulating over the household’s life expectancy. The RMD tables generally result in too little wealth being consumed at younger ages, and are, therefore, relatively attractive to households with low intertemporal elasticities of consumption. But all the above strategies fall well short of the theoretical optimum.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Sun & Anthony Webb, 2012. "Should Households Base Asset Decumulation Strategies on Required Minimum Distribution Tables?," Working Papers, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College wp2012-10, Center for Retirement Research, revised Apr 2012.
  • Handle: RePEc:crr:crrwps:wp2012-10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://crr.bc.edu/working-papers/should-households-base-asset-decumulation-strategies-on-required-minimum-distribution-tables/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brown, Jeffrey R. & Poterba, James & Richardson, David P., 2017. "Do Required Minimum Distribution Rules Matter? The Effect of the 2009 Holiday on Retirement Plan Distributions," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 96-109.
    2. Alicia H. Munnell & Gal Wettstein & Wenliang Hou, 2022. "How best to annuitize defined contribution assets?," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 89(1), pages 211-235, March.
    3. Jeffrey R. Brown & James Poterba & David Richardson, 2014. "Do Required Minimum Distributions Matter? The Effect of the 2009 Holiday On Retirement Plan Distributions," NBER Working Papers 20464, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:crrwps:wp2012-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.