What to Expect from Regional and Multilateral Trade Negotiations: A Public Choice Perspective
It is commonly observed that international trade negotiations repeatedly fail to achieve outcomes that would appear to satisfy the criteria of efficiency and mutual advantage. It can be argued that this is due principally to the influence of interest groups. This paper develops an analytical structure for assessing the process of international trade negotiations that includes interest groups and self-interested negotiators as fundamental elements. The central conclusion of the analysis is that it is likely to be very difficult for a government that wishes to promote national welfare to do so. The political economy analysis suggests there are strong incentives facing politicians to produce agreements whose profile appears distinctly liberalizing while significant protectionist character flaws tend to be buried in the esoterica. The primary need is to design institutions that will help to introduce much greater transparency in both regional and multilateral agreements and thereby encourage the mobilization of diffuse consumer interests. Only then will significant progress towards liberalization - whether regional or multilateral - become more likely.
|Date of creation:||Jan 1993|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Centre for Economic Policy Research, 77 Bastwick Street, London EC1V 3PZ.|
Phone: 44 - 20 - 7183 8801
Fax: 44 - 20 - 7183 8820
|Order Information:|| Email: |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.