IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/289.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Democratic Model of the `Rent-Sought' Benefit Cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Beenstock, Michael

Abstract

Lobby groups press for various administrative concessions which are granted at the expense of the rest of society. This paper tries to explain why sometimes the rest of society does not prevent the lobbies from exploiting them while at other times it protests against the injustice. It also suggests why after a while the public may demand a reform in which the concessions are abolished. The basic analytical insight is that there may be an externality to successful lobbying; when one group succeeds this establishes a precedent that makes it easier for other groups to succeed. The chain reaction that is thus triggered may be to the advantage of a majority of the electorate.

Suggested Citation

  • Beenstock, Michael, 1989. "A Democratic Model of the `Rent-Sought' Benefit Cycle," CEPR Discussion Papers 289, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=289
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xavier de Vanssay & Zane A. Spindler, 1994. "Is Tax Reform in the Public Interest? a Rent-Seeking Perspective," Public Finance Review, , vol. 22(1), pages 3-21, January.
    2. Cedric D. Nathan & Zane A. Spindler, 1993. "Squatting as Rent-seeking and Pressure-group Competition: A South African Case-Study," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 30(3), pages 477-494, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.