IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/20376.html

Are Viewer and Advertiser Preferences Aligned? Evidence from Israel

Author

Listed:
  • He, Chen
  • Shacham, Ittai
  • Klein, Tobias

Abstract

Consumers usually dislike ads, yet firms continue to spend heavily on them. We use two years of high-frequency data on prime-time TV advertising in Israel to study how this distaste — measured by the fraction of viewers who switch to another channel — varies by demographic group and by the sector of the advertising firm. We also estimate the value advertisers place on impressions and how this varies by viewer demographics and firm sector. Our main finding is a negative relationship between viewer and advertiser valuations across sectors: advertisements from sectors that value viewers more are generally less liked by those viewers than ads from other sectors. In a counterfactual simulation, we show that sector-specific advertising prices would likely benefit viewers, as they would reduce the number of ads from less-liked sectors. Sector-specific prices would also benefit TV stations by generating higher advertising revenues than uniform pricing.

Suggested Citation

  • He, Chen & Shacham, Ittai & Klein, Tobias, 2025. "Are Viewer and Advertiser Preferences Aligned? Evidence from Israel," CEPR Discussion Papers 20376, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP20376
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • M37 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Advertising

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:20376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.