IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cost-effectiveness of CT, EUS and PET/CT in Evaluating Patients with Symptoms of Pancreatic Cancer in Colombia


  • Mario Garcia-Molina


  • Liliana Alejandra Chicaiza


  • Oscar Gamboa



Introduction: An estimated 1,399 new cases of pancreatic cancer (PC) and 1,406 deaths from the same cause occurred in Colombia in 2002. We evaluate the cost-effectiveness of multidetector computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) in diagnosis and staging of patients with clinical suspicion of PC.Materials and methods: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis based upon a systematic search to determine the strategies´ sensitivity and specificity. The costs of administering and monitoring were taken from the official tariff manuals. The results were assessed in terms of number of correct behaviours. We performed deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.Results: CT showed the best cost-effectiveness indicator (Col$ 3,397,163 for each appropriate behaviour). The cost of changing the strategy to that of CT plus EUS was Col$ 7,893,573 for each additional appropriate behavior. In the probabilistic analysis the cost-effective strategy was USE for a willingness to pay higher than Col$ 9,000,000 per additional unit, or TAC for smaller values.Conclusion: The cost-effective strategy in the evaluation of patients suspected PCis the multidetector CT. For values of willingness to pay more than Col$ 7,893,573 and Col$ 9,000,000 per additional unit cost-effective alternatives are EUS or CT plus EUS in series.

Suggested Citation

  • Mario Garcia-Molina & Liliana Alejandra Chicaiza & Oscar Gamboa, 2010. "Cost-effectiveness of CT, EUS and PET/CT in Evaluating Patients with Symptoms of Pancreatic Cancer in Colombia," DOCUMENTOS DE TRABAJO - ESCUELA DE ECONOMÍA 007570, UN - RCE - CID.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000178:007570

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    Predator - prey model; Non - linear dynamic behavior; Demand cycles; Employment; Distribution.;

    JEL classification:

    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000178:007570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Facultad de Ciencias Económicas Unal). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.