IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000149/011031.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Karl Marx y Max Weber: ¿ruptura o continuidad?

Author

Listed:
  • Mejía Sanabria, Carlos Alberto

Abstract

El comienzo del siglo XX pudo contemplar la emergencia de un intenso debate, que se prolonga hasta nuestros días, en torno a la obra de Karl Marx y Max Weber. En el afloraron diferencias sustanciales respecto de las perspectivas teóricas de los dos autores en el abordaje de diversas temáticas tratadas por ellos, algunas relacionadas con el método del materialismo histórico, el conocido asunto de la relación entre base económica y superestructura, el papel de las ideas y de la religión, particularmente del protestantismo, en la transformación del mundo material o las clases sociales y la función del Estado. Pensadores diversos han querido ver allí una radical ruptura teórica entre dos de los fundadores de la disciplina de la Sociología, iniciándose una corriente de pensamiento que aviva una ya prolongada tradición de enfrentamientos. Alguna evidencia empírica permite sostener que, antes que profundas rupturas, parecieran más bien identificarse líneas de continuidad entre los corpus de pensamiento que nos legaron los autores en cuestión

Suggested Citation

  • Mejía Sanabria, Carlos Alberto, 2013. "Karl Marx y Max Weber: ¿ruptura o continuidad?," Documentos de Trabajo 11031, Universidad del Valle, CIDSE.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000149:011031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cms.univalle.edu.co/socioeconomia/media/files/DOCUMENTO%20DE%20TRABAJO%20N%C2%B0153%20CM%20Final.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Materialismo histórico; Protestantismo; Marx; Karl; 1818-1883; Weber; Max; 1864 - 1920; Crítica e interpretación;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000149:011031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CENDOC (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cicevco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.