IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Reformbedarf bei den Bundesfernstraßen und das Potential des PPP-Ansatzes

Listed author(s):
  • Thorsten Beckers


    (Workgroup for Infrastructure Policy (WIP), Technische Universität Berlin)

  • Christian von Hirschhausen


    (Chair of Energy Economics and Public Sector Management, Technische Universität Dresden)

  • Jan Peter Klatt


    (Workgroup for Infrastructure Policy (WIP), Technische Universität Berlin)

This article analyzes the efficiency impacts of PPP-projects in the highway sector. The economic analysis concludes that the PPP-approach should primarily be considered as an alternative procurement strategy. PPP can be suitable for the new built, extension and renewal of certain highway stretches to reduce costs, whereas the application of the PPP approach for entire networks seems to go along with cost increases. For achieving the potential cost reductions in PPPs for stretches, risks should be allocated in an efficient way between the involved parties, and tendering procedures should be competitive. Apart from that, well-elaborated contracts as well as credible and stable public institutions in charge of preparing, tendering and monitoring the projects are necessary to ensure the success of PPPs. It is also found that concession models which combine the PPP-approach with a remuneration of the concessionaire based on user payments are not an appropriate instrument to solve financial problems in the highway network; they should only be considered in exceptional cases for stretches with little traffic deviation in the case of tolling. The lack of funding in the German federal trunk road sector should rather be addressed by the implementation of a road fund which should receive earmarked user charges. A further result is that the current PPP-models in Germany (A-Model, F-Model, and Functional Construction Contract) feature some design deficits and need to be adapted in order to achieve the goal of increased cost efficiency.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Center for Network Industries and Infrastructure (CNI) in its series Working Papers with number 2006-03.

in new window

Length: 40 pages
Date of creation:
Date of revision: 19 Jun 2006
Publication status: Published in Zeitschrift für Verkehrswissenschaft (ZfV), Vol. 77 Issue 2, S.105-142
Handle: RePEc:cni:wpaper:2006-03
Contact details of provider: Postal:
++49 / (0)30 / 314 - 25 048

Phone: ++49 / (0)30 / 314 - 25 048
Fax: ++49 / (0)30 / 314 - 26 934
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cni:wpaper:2006-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Fabian Kirsch)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.