IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Efficient Estimation of Mortality Rates Using Micro and Macro Data

Listed author(s):
  • Derek S. Brown
  • Holger Sieg
Registered author(s):

    Dynamic discrete choice models are a well established and widely used methodology to study behavior of older individuals. A key aspect of the analysis is to characterize life expectancy and how it is affected by behavioral choices. Researchers, therefore, need to estimate conditional mortality rates to implement these estimators. However, publicly available data sets which follow older individuals are often not large enough to get reliable estimates of mortality rates. Hence estimates of conditional mortality probabilities may not be informative since they have large estimated standard errors. Imbens and Lancaster (1994) have recently proposed a solution to this problem. The key idea is to obtain a more efficient estimator by combining panel data with aggregate data. Following this approach, we estimate qualitative response models of mortality rates by combining panel data from the Health and Retirement Survey with aggregate data from U.S. life tables. Our empirical results show that the Imbens and Lancaster estimator achieves significant efficiency gains over simpler estimators which ignore macro data. We also find that the estimated coefficients of the mortality model change significantly as we add additional orthogonality conditions based on life tables in estimation. These finding supports our conjecture that estimators based on simple qualitative response models may be subject to small sample bias. Finally, we illustrate that the improvements in estimation of mortality probabilities can have significant consequences for evaluating public policies. We consider simple life-cycle computations of health care expenditures associated with smoking and heavy drinking.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Paper provided by Carnegie Mellon University, Tepper School of Business in its series GSIA Working Papers with number 2003-05.

    in new window

    Date of creation:
    Handle: RePEc:cmu:gsiawp:-1438339438
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890

    Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmu:gsiawp:-1438339438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Steve Spear)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.