IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/clg/wpaper/2019-13.html

Hollywood Studio Filmmaking in the Age of Netflix: A Tale of Two Institutional Logics

Author

Listed:
  • Allègre L. Hadida
  • Joseph Lampel
  • Amit Joshi
  • W. D. Walls

    (University of Calgary)

Abstract

New online streaming services are challenging long-standing decision-making processes in the traditional motion picture industry, thus placing Hollywood major studios at a crossroads. We use the institutional logics perspective to examine how both traditional studios and new online streaming services make strategic decisions on which films to produce and how these films should be distributed, and scenario analysis to anticipate how their interaction will likely evolve. We argue that the key criteria that studio executives use to make such decisions are shaped by what we define as a commitment institutional logic: decision making heuristics that focus their attention on theatrical release and box office intakes. In contrast, the new online streaming services follow a convenience institutional logic, the product of advanced data analytics to increase subscriptions. In the convenience institutional logic, the need to drive online traffic by providing users with an extensive catalogue of film offerings guides film development and distribution decisions. Whereas the commitment logic aims for mass-market hits in cinemas, the convenience logic seeks to reach a wide range of subscribers at home with micro-segmented content. We compare the two logics, develop four scenarios of how the interaction between them may shape the film industry, and offer recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Allègre L. Hadida & Joseph Lampel & Amit Joshi & W. D. Walls, "undated". "Hollywood Studio Filmmaking in the Age of Netflix: A Tale of Two Institutional Logics," Working Papers 2019-13, Department of Economics, University of Calgary.
  • Handle: RePEc:clg:wpaper:2019-13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Nam, Jinyoung & Ro, Dan & Jung, Yoonhyuk, 2023. "Netflix's presence: Investigating content producers' understanding of Netflix in the Korean media industry," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(4).
    3. Sjøvaag, Helle & Olsen, Ragnhild Kr. & Ferrer-Conill, Raul, 2024. "Delivering content: Modular broadcasting technology and the role of content delivery networks," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4).
    4. Thorsten Hennig-Thurau & S. Abraham Ravid & Olav Sorenson, 2021. "The Economics of Filmed Entertainment in the Digital Era," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(2), pages 157-170, June.
    5. Nicolas R. Weber & André Marchand & Reinhard E. Kunz, 2024. "The global impact of public and private funding on cultural and economic movie success: evidence from German film funding," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 48(2), pages 259-283, June.
    6. Joël Hellier, 2022. "Asymmetric Globalization and Top Performers Income," Working Papers REM 2022/0242, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    7. Jordi McKenzie, 2023. "The economics of movies (revisited): A survey of recent literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 480-525, April.
    8. Ricard Gil & S. Abraham Ravid & Olav Sorenson, 2025. "Talent and technology in creative industries: introduction to the special issue," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 49(2), pages 241-255, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:clg:wpaper:2019-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Department of Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/declgca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.