IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cir/cirpro/2003rp-06.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Partage des coûts et tarification des infrastructures - Tarification optimale des infrastructures communes

Author

Listed:
  • Marcel Boyer
  • Michel Moreaux
  • Michel Truchon

Abstract

The general interest would require that the use of major equipments be priced at their marginal cost, including all opportunity costs such as congestion and pollution costs. At least, prices should be lowered until full utilization of these equipments is obtained. This is a result that economists call the first best solution. Unfortunately, under increasing returns to scale, such prices lead to a deficit. In order to covers all monetary costs, the managers must then fix prices above the marginal costs. In the general interest, they should do so while trying to preserve as much as possible the first best features, i.e. by maximizing the use of these equipments for the largest well being of the citizens. This is what economists call a second best solution, i.e. the best solution given the budget balance constraint. The problem is to find the prices that will meet this objective. These are the questions addressed in this report. We start with the Ramsey-Boiteux or linear pricing. In this case, there is only one price for each good or service, although prices may vary from one category of customers to the other. Next, we show that one can do better with multi-part or non-linear prices, comprising fix charges, usage fees, etc. The report ends with a brief survey of actual applications of linear and non-linear prices. L'intérêt général commanderait qu'on tarife l'usage des infrastructures à leur coût marginal, en prenant soin d'y inclure tous les coûts d'opportunité, dont ceux liés à la congestion et à la pollution. À tout le moins, on devrait abaisser les tarifs de manière à assurer une pleine utilisation de ces infrastructures. Ce résultat est connu par les économistes comme la solution de premier rang. Malheureusement, dans un contexte d'économie d'échelle, ce mode de tarification conduit à un déficit. Pour couvrir les coûts monétaires, les gestionnaires doivent alors élever les tarifs au-dessus des coûts marginaux. Dans l'intérêt général, les recettes totales devraient alors être prélevées grâce à une gestion aussi proche que possible du premier rang, c'est-à-dire en maximisant l'usage de l'infrastructure, pour le plus grand bien-être des citoyens. On cherche alors ce que les économistes appellent la solution de second rang, i.e. la meilleure solution sous la contrainte d'équilibre budgétaire. Le problème est de déterminer les tarifs de manière à atteindre cet objectif. C'est la problématique étudiée dans ce rapport. On débute par la tarification à la Ramsey-Boiteux ou encore linéaire. Dans ce cas, il n'y a qu'un prix par unité de bien ou service, bien qu'il puisse varier d'un bien à un autre. Ensuite, on montre qu'on peut faire mieux avec des tarifs polynômes ou non linéaires, comprenant des charges fixes, des prix d'usage, etc. On termine par un bref survol des applications qui ont été faites de la tarification linéaire et non linéaire.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcel Boyer & Michel Moreaux & Michel Truchon, 2003. "Partage des coûts et tarification des infrastructures - Tarification optimale des infrastructures communes," CIRANO Project Reports 2003rp-06, CIRANO.
  • Handle: RePEc:cir:cirpro:2003rp-06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2003RP-06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tehrani Nejad Moghaddam, Alireza, 2010. "Allocating the CO2 emissions of an oil refinery with Aumann-Shapley prices: Comment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 243-255, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pricing; Ramsey-Boiteux; non-linear prices; infrastructures; tarification; Ramsey-Boiteux; prix non linéaires; infrastructures;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cir:cirpro:2003rp-06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Webmaster). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ciranca.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.